# Governance

### Editorial Accountability

**Primary author**  
Zush Editorial Team

**Technical reviewer**  
Zush Product Team

**Update cadence**  
Criteria are reviewed monthly, with material changes logged in [the changelog](/content/changelog/index.html).

### Scoring Rubric

Each workflow run is graded against a weighted model that balances naming accuracy, operational safety, and day-to-day usability inside a macOS workflow.

| Dimension | Weight | What we measure |
| --- | --- | --- |
| Semantic filename accuracy | 35% | Does the new name describe file meaning, not only generic patterns? |
| Consistency in batch runs | 20% | Stable naming style across mixed files in one task. |
| Automation depth | 15% | Batch workflow, folder monitoring, and repeatability. |
| Safety controls | 15% | History, rollback, preview-before-apply behavior. |
| Operational fit | 15% | macOS workflow quality, speed, and setup friction. |

### Benchmark Protocol

1. **01**  
Use a mixed-file benchmark set with screenshots, photos, PDFs, and office documents.

2. **02**  
Run controlled rename jobs with identical prompts and naming constraints.

3. **03**  
Score outputs against the rubric and record false positives or ambiguous labels.

4. **04**  
Validate revert and recovery behavior before marking a setup as production-safe.

5. **05**  
Repeat checks after release updates and track material changes in the changelog.